The Poetics of Silence: Reimagining Voice and Absence in Contemporary Women’s Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRHSS2525130Keywords:
Silence, Feminist Literary Theory, Poststructuralism, Voice and Agency, Subaltern Identity, Margaret AtwoodAbstract
This paper explores the dialectic of voice and silence in contemporary women’s writing, analysing how selected texts by Margaret Atwood, Arundhati Roy, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie reimagine silence as a site of resistance and self-definition. Grounded in feminist and poststructuralist theory (Cixous, Irigaray, Spivak), the study situates silence within the historical discourse of female oppression and reinterprets it as a strategy of empowerment. Through comparative textual analysis, the research demonstrates that silence in women’s narratives functions not as void but as creative agency, mediating trauma, identity, and cultural displacement. The findings suggest that silence possesses its own rhetorical power—constructing alternative modes of expression that challenge patriarchal discourse and expand the boundaries of feminist poetics. Ultimately, the paper argues that to be silent is not to be voiceless, but to reimagine what voice can mean.
Downloads
References
Adichie, C. N. (2013). Americanah. Fourth Estate.
Atwood, M. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland & Stewart.
Cixous, H. (1976). The laugh of the Medusa (P. Cohen & K. Cohen, Trans.). Signs, 1(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1086/493306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493306
Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1977) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_22
Roy, A. (1997). The God of Small Things. IndiaInk / Random House.
Showalter, E. (1977). A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691221960
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373377
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Vintage Books.
hooks, b. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press.
Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Routledge.
Tyagi, R. (2014). Silence as a narrative strategy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2014.V1.10
Ugwu, A. & Okeke, P. (2022). The quiet cage: Gendered silence and internalized patriarchy in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah. NeuroQuantology, 20(12), 8812–8820. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.12.NQ22168
Waugh, P. (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291335.001.0001
Cram.com. (2023). Handmaid’s Tale Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.cram.com/essay/Handmaids-Tale-Analysis/PCXXXK9KWU
Probinism. (2022). The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy – Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.probinism.com/the-god-of-small-things-arundhati-roy-analysis
IJLLL.org. (2021). Silence as Successful Communicative Instance in Roy’s Fiction. Retrieved from https://www.ijlll.org/vol5/224-LL307.pdf
NeuroQuantology.com. (2023). Gendered Silence and Patriarchy in Adichie’s Americanah. Retrieved from https://www.neuroquantology.com/open-access/The%2BQuiet%2BCage
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.