Digital Mythmaking: The Rebirth of Archetypes in Postmodern Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRHSS253812Keywords:
Digital Mythmaking, Archetypes, Postmodern Literature, Myth Criticism, Hypertext, IntertextualityAbstract
This paper explores the rebirth of archetypes in postmodern and digital literature, examining how mythic structures are reconfigured in contemporary narratives by authors such as Salman Rushdie, Jeanette Winterson, and Neil Gaiman. Grounded in myth criticism (Frye, Campbell, Barthes) and postmodern narrative theory, the study investigates how classical archetypes the hero, the trickster, the shapeshifter are transformed through intertextual play, narrative multiplicity, and multimedia adaptation. The analysis highlights the role of digital storytelling, hypertext, and participatory culture in reshaping mythic imagination and constructing new forms of collective memory. Findings suggest that, while mythic structures persist, they operate in fluid, networked, and interactive contexts, demonstrating that postmodern myth is both a site of cultural critique and a vehicle for imaginative engagement. The study contributes to understanding the dynamic interplay between tradition, technology, and narrative innovation in contemporary literature.
Downloads
References
Gaiman, N. (2001). American Gods. William Morrow.
Rushdie, S. (1988). The Satanic Verses. Viking Press.
Winterson, J. (1989). Sexing the Cherry. Bloomsbury.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill & Wang. (Original work published 1957)
Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton University Press.
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400866908
Irigaray, L. (1985). This Sex Which Is Not One (C. Porter & C. Burke, Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 1977) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_22
Tyagi, R. (2014). Silence as a narrative strategy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2014.V1.10
Ugwu, A., & Okeke, P. (2022). The quiet cage: Gendered silence and internalized patriarchy in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah. NeuroQuantology, 20(12), 8812–8820. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.12.NQ22168
Waugh, P. (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291335.001.0001
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373377
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Vintage Books.
hooks, b. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. South End Press.
Moi, T. (1985). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Routledge.
Cram.com. (2023). Handmaid’s Tale Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.cram.com/essay/Handmaids-Tale-Analysis/PCXXXK9KWU
Probinism. (2022). The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy – Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.probinism.com/the-god-of-small-things-arundhati-roy-analysis
IJLLL.org. (2021). Silence as Successful Communicative Instance in Roy’s Fiction. Retrieved from https://www.ijlll.org/vol5/224-LL307.pdf
NeuroQuantology.com. (2023). Gendered Silence and Patriarchy in Adichie’s Americanah. Retrieved from https://www.neuroquantology.com/open-access/The%2BQuiet%2BCag
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Scientific Research in Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.